Background Image
 1 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
1 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

11

Investigating a Model of Mentoring for Effective Teaching

Dr. Lori Bird and Dr. Peter Hudson

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Mentoring has become a crucial component of preservice field experiences, such as

student teaching, and should be purposeful and intentional with its results, not left to chance.

However, “mentors seem to need exposure to a variety of models of mentoring in their training

as well as practice in the observation and analysis of interactions between mentor and mentee”

(Harrison, Lawson, & Wortley, 2005, p. 290). Indeed, models of mentoring need to be

investigated to determine applicability to varying contexts. This study currently investigates one

particular model of mentoring for effective teaching. Hudson, Skamp, and Brooks (2005)

describe five factors of mentoring that are utilized by mentors to support student teachers

through the field experience process. The five mentoring factors are: personal attributes, system

requirements, pedagogical knowledge, modeling, and feedback. The purpose of this study was to

investigate the student teachers’ perceptions of the five factors of mentoring and address the

following question: What are the student teachers’ perceptions of the mentoring factors that

contributed to success in their student teaching experience? The theoretical framework for this

study, the five mentoring factors and associated attributes and practices, are explained in the

following sections.

Personal attributes

Effective mentors draw upon personal and interpersonal skills to engage with their

mentees. These personal attributes focus on maintaining a strong and trusting relationship with

the mentee (Moir, 2009; Moir, Barlin, Gless, & Miles, 2009; Udelhofen & Larson, 2002). Danin

and Bacon (1999) support the mentor’s need for effective communication using personal

attributes, particularly when the mentor was “supportive, and willing to listen” (p. 204). This

supportiveness can arrive in terms of professional and emotional support as a way for the mentor

to interact with the mentee (Beck & Kosnick, 2002). In a study of 149 mentoring teams, Kilburg

(2007) found that when new teachers did not receive emotional support from their mentor, they

were “more apt to have anxiety, insecurity and lack of confidence” (p. 297). Mentoring support

includes encouraging the mentee to reflect teaching experiences towards developing a teaching

identity (Pitton, 2006). Glenn (2006) describes the relationship between mentors and mentees as

a collaborative “give and take,” where the mentors and mentees care about each other personally

as well as professionally (p. 5). Without this kind of supportive relationship, the impact on the

mentee’s practice may be limited. Finally, good mentors set an example for professionalism in

teaching. Other common dispositional characteristics for mentors can include authenticity,

gentleness, enthusiasm, patience, consistency, and a positive attitude (Hurst & Reding, 2002).

System requirements

Preservice teachers enter schools with little knowledge of the organization and the

politics of school life. Mentors help them navigate the new context in which they work by

learning to understand the complexities of the school’s cultural context. They need opportunities