Background Image
Previous Page  7 / 11 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 11 Next Page
Page Background

28

[Internship Graduate]:

Encourage more students to complete internship because it builds greater

rapport with students, continuity in teaching the curriculum, and a better "feel" for how teaching

really goes.

[Single Semester Graduate]:

I believe it would be more beneficial for all students to be required

to do two full semesters in student teaching. This would better prepare the student teachers for

teaching. I believed that my student teaching was the more educational thing I did during

college. I truly wish I would have done an internship. I believe my first year would have gone

much better if I had.

Discussion

The educational route taken to enter the teaching profession makes a difference in

classroom effectiveness and career longevity (Darling-Hammond, 2006a). Intuition would lead

one to believe that more practice at a skill indeed results in greater skill attainment. Related to

this study, it would seem those who received more education-related coursework and more hours

of clinical practice, especially focused on populations of high need, would realize better career

outcomes. The programs of study this research examined showed great variance in the number

of education courses required and hours spent in the field working with students in general and

with students from diverse populations, particularly. It seems counterintuitive that there is little

difference between the outcomes of someone who spent over 200 hours in classrooms working

with greater numbers of students with high needs compared to another who spent only 43 hours

working with a more homogeneous group of students. For this case study, the graduates—even

those who left teaching and who never started—perceived their education as adequately

preparatory. (Note: Respondents indicating they never entered teaching after their degrees were

conferred completed survey questions about this decision. None of the respondents indicated

inadequate preparation for teaching; all provided other reasons for taking different career paths

after graduation. Some of the reasons given for not entering teaching included raising a family,

health problems, and no openings available.) What is it, then, that compelled the participants in

this study to maintain fairly similar feelings about their preservice experiences and their post-

graduation outcomes, even though their paths to the classroom differed?

Perhaps an answer is hidden within Cochran-Smith’s (2008) theory of social justice in

teacher education and other research focusing on the social and cultural contexts of schooling.

This theory, integrating theories for social justice, teaching practice, and teacher preparation,

promotes equity, recognition, and respect for all social, racial, and cultural groups. It views

teachers as “potential agents of social change…[who] can influence students’ learning and life

chances” (p. 16) and views teacher education as the source for future teachers “to learn about

subject matter, pedagogy, culture, language, the social and cultural contexts of schooling, and the

purposes of education” (p. 21). Closer examination of the demographics of the participants as

well as the students they teach, the teacher educators, and similarities instead of differences

among the programs of study, could provide more insight.

Research indicates some of the problems with early career attrition is the disconnect

between the backgrounds of students and their teachers (“A High Quality Teacher,” 2000). A

majority of the study sample were employed in high poverty rural schools and most indicated

working with students from diverse populations, yet research indicates that schools filled with

such diversity can be overwhelming to teachers who are working with students who differ in