Background Image
Previous Page  4 / 9 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 9 Next Page
Page Background

95

Table 2 displays both principal and teacher mean scores of transformational leadership

practice from the LBI. The core competency with the strongest congruency between principal

and teacher data was Reflection. Principals also reported that promoting the core competency of

Diversity was their second highest campus priority. Principal data further revealed Curriculum

and Instruction to be the least likely core competency they practiced. The core competency of

Visionary Leadership was the second highest characteristic their principals practiced. Secondary

teacher data revealed Professional Development as the least likely core competency practiced by

their principals.

Table 2

Principals and teachers frequency scores for from Highest to Lowest

Core Competency

M

(SD) for

Principals

Core

Competency

M

(SD) for

Teachers

Reflection

Diversity

Visionary Leadership

Learning Community

Professionalism

Prof. Dev.

Assessment

Org. Mgt

Inquiry

Unity of Purpose

Collaboration

Instr. Leadership

Curr. & Instr.

3.4 (.44)

3.27 (.46)

3.21 (.42)

3.17 (.50)

3.17 (.63)

3.16 (.51)

3.13 (.59)

3.10 (.50)

3.08 (.68)

3.02 (.64)

3.01 (.62)

2.99 (.74)

2.94 (.65)

Reflection

Visionary Leadership

Inquiry

Learning Community

Diversity

Org. Mgt

Professionalism

Curr. & Instr

Unity of Purpose

Assessment

Collaboration

Instr. Leadership

Prof. Dev.

3.57(.57)

3.49 (.67)

3.43 (.54)

3.43 (.60)

3.37 (.68)

3.34 (.70)

3.34 (.76)

3.33 (.75)

3.33 (.68)

3.30 (.65)

3.28 (.74)

3.22 (.72)

3.21 (.74)

Qualitative Phase

Qualitative data from 8 participants-- 4 teachers (2 from diverse and 2 from non-diverse)

and 4 principals (2 from diverse and 2 from non-diverse)-- was collected to expound core beliefs,

perceptions, perspectives and practices on their secondary school context, as teachers and

leaders.

Table 4 displays the demographic data of the eight participants’ who contributed to the

interviews. Geographically, participants covered a large portion of the state of Texas and were

from various diverse and non-diverse school districts in the state from both rural and urban areas.